Energy 2050 Report Launch Event
9:00 AM - 5:00 AM, 30 April 2009
As part of its Energy 2050 project the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC) launched it's major new report addressing two of the Government's toughest energy policy goals – delivering reliable energy to consumers while meeting its legal commitment to reduce C02 emissions by 80% by 2050.
The report concludes that:
- The UK electricity sector must be decarbonised by 2050, by which time oil use will be virtually eliminated
- Tougher energy efficiency measures could reduce exposure to volatile energy markets, buying us time before full decarbonisation of the electricity system takes place
- New and improved low-carbon technologies need a reliable carbon price; a market signal of around £200/tonne C02 by 2050, 15 times the current EU carbon price, is needed to hit the long-term target. This rises to £300-350/tonne C02 if action is delayed or more stringent targets are set
The report finds that decarbonising the electricity system with nuclear, renewables and coal plant fitted with carbon capture and storage (CCS) would unlock new potential, allowing electricity to be increasingly used in transport and buildings. A low-carbon energy system could be a high-electricity system.
But it also shows that the more aggressive pursuit of energy efficiency would make the UK system more secure while still leaving it on track to hit the 2050 target. Under this scenario, energy efficiency provides insurance against delays in the development of low carbon technologies, allowing decarbonisation to take place a decade later.
- Energy efficiency is the most cost-effective way of reducing energy demand and carbon emissions, while protecting vulnerable consumers from higher energy prices
- None of the UKERC scenarios foresee renewable energy going in sufficiently quickly to meet the target in the EU Climate and Energy Package
- Lifestyle changes could dramatically reduce the cost of meeting CO2 targets. This could involve phasing out petrol/diesel vehicles in town and city centres by 2050, though the use of vans could increase as a result of restrictions on HGVs and an increase in internet shopping. Halving energy use in homes is possible with a combination of major efficiency improvements and modest lifestyle change
- Reducing CO2 emissions leads, for the most part, to reductions in other environmental emissions; the release of some pollutants, notably sulphur dioxide, will fall substantially. However, pressures on water and land use will need to be managed, as will some atmospheric emissions and radioactive releases
- Major gas shocks could have cost impacts measured in £billions, mainly through lost supplies to industrial consumers. More investment in gas storage or import facilities could mitigate these impacts
- Investing in research and technological innovation would significantly reduce the cost of reaching CO2 targets; substantial increases in R&D expenditure appear justified
- Early action on carbon reduction implies taking a longer-term view of investment in a low-carbon energy system: investing more in infrastructure and solutions such as low carbon buildings, hydrogen fuel cells and electric vehicles
- Microgeneration offers a radically different approach to meeting energy needs, but capital cost and performance are currently barriers for many technologies. However, it could be important in meeting future residential heating needs, and could help catalyse change towards low carbon lifestyles
Commenting on the findings, Professor Jim Skea, Research Director at UKERC said: "UK energy policy goals are extraordinarily ambitious. Meeting them will require efforts well beyond the bounds of historical experience. By looking at the energy system in the round, our researchers have shown not only that the goals can be met but that it is possible to reconcile them with wider technological, social and environmental changes".
- Introduction - Prof Jim Skea, Research Director, UKERC
- Key Messages - Prof Jim Skea
- Carbon Reduction Scenarios - Dr Neil Strachan
- Energy Lifestyles - Dr Jillian Anable
- Environmental Sensitivities: values, impacts and trade-offs - Dr David Howard
- Technology Acceleration - Dr Mark Winskel
- The Role of Microgeneration - Dr Adam Hawkes
- A Resilient Energy System for energy security - Prof Jim Skea and Prof Paul Ekins
During the launch of the report, an audience of over 200 energy experts and interested parties from academia, business, Government and NGOs voted electronically on potentially divisive energy issues presented by UKERC.
- Only 9% of the audience thought the Government would reach its target of reducing C02 emissions by 80% by 2050. Most (43%) said C02 emissions would fall by 40-60%
- 29% said carbon capture and storage would be economically viable by 2025, taking into account carbon pricing. 10% said after 2030 and 14% said never. However, following presentations on Technology Acceleration and Resilience, the 10% who previously thought 'after 2030' increased to 67%
- 49% predicted system-wide disruptions of electricity supplies before 2020 and 52% believed the same would happen to gas supplies
- 31% of respondents thought it possible that UK CO2 emissions could fall by more than 90% by 2050, taking account only of technical and economic feasibility. However, following presentations on Carbon Reduction Scenarios, Energy Lifestyles and Environmental Sensitivities, a repeat poll showed less audience conviction, with just 19% voting the same way
- Most respondents (30%) chose coal-fired power stations without CCS as the technology/fuel they most had reservations about in combating climate change because of other environmental impacts
- 73% said microgeneration would co-exist with centralised electricity generation