Carbon Capture and Storage - Realising the Potential?
The report identifies four key areas where choices need to be made:
- Deciding whether to keep options open, or close them down. The French government focused on one technological variety early on for its nuclear programme. Doing this for CCS may help speed up development, but there is a risk of picking inferior technology. The authors caution that it is too early for government and industry to close down on a particular variant of CCS technology. They welcome the plans for several substantial demonstration projects which will help to identify which variants of CCS technology can be scaled up successfully.
- Designing financial support for effective CCS demonstration and deployment. A regulatory approach that makes CCS compulsory for all fossil plants will only work if the technology is more advanced, and the additional costs can be passed onto consumers. CCS technologies are not yet at this stage. In the mean time, the government should ensure that industry maximises efficiency and minimises costs of new CCS plants. History shows that not all demonstrations will perform as expected, and government should ensure that lessons are learned from successes and failures.
- CCS deployment is a marathon, not a sprint. Developing new energy technologies can take a long time, and the process is often far from smooth. The report shows that costs do not necessarily fall in the way supporters hope – and can rise for several years before they come down, as technologies are scaled up. This requires patience. Government also needs to ensure it has an independent capability to assess costs to inform future decisions about whether to continue with public funding for CCS or to divert resources to other low carbon options.
- Dealing with storage liabilities. The report shows highlights lessons from UK nuclear waste management policy to show how complex liability arrangements for CO2 storage could be. For CCS, a balance needs to be struck between limiting liabilities for investors and protecting the interests of future taxpayers. Agreements will be needed on where this balance should lie, and what arrangements are needed to fund and insure against potential liabilities.
The project is a collaboration of four universities: Sussex, Edinburgh, Cardiff and Imperial College. It was conducted in close co-operation with a stakeholder steering group, chaired by Dr Tony White.
- University of Sussex: Jim Watson and Florian Kern
- University of Edinburgh: Stuart Haszeldine, Jon Gibbins, Nils Markusson, Hannah Chalmers, Navraj Ghaleigh, Francisco Ascui and Stathis Arapostathis and Mark Winskel
- Imperial College: Rob Gross and Phil Heptonstall
- Cardiff University: Peter Pearson
Case study reports, summaries
The Nuclear Programme in France (1950s-1980s)
Scaling up and deployment of FGD in the US (1960s-2009)
Natural gas network development in the UK (1960-2010)
The development of the CCGT and the ‘dash for gas’ in the UK power industry (1987-2000)
Markusson, N. et al (2012) A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology. In Press Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
von Stechow, C., Watson, J. and Praetorius, B. (2011). Policy Incentives for CCS Technologies in Europe: A Qualitative Multi-Criteria Analysis Global Environmental Change 21(2) 346-357.
Listen to Professor Jim Watson outline the findings of the UKERC CCS report on BBC Radio 4 Today, 19 April 2012 (interview starts at 03.18)
Watch YouTube footage from the UKERC CCS media briefing, hosted by the Science Media Centre:
- Prof Jim Watson explains what carbon capture and storage is all about
- Prof Jim Watson outlines the uncertainties around carbon capture and storage
- Prof Jim Watson outlines the policy dilemmas for Government
- Prof Stuart Haszeldine - carbon capture and storage: what are the storage problems?
- journalist Q&A part 1
- journalist Q&A part 2
- journalist Q&A part 3
- journalist Q&A part 4